This, I would submit, is the song of the anti-intellectual Left, the no-think thinkers. Perhaps, in the nature of things, it is impossible to write a review that is strongly critical without being offensive or destructive. I have long been distressed by the venomous tone of much academic controversy, and would not wish to add to it.
I must therefore pick and choose. Let me begin by saying that I have been in charge of children in their first ten years of life. For four years I was a regular fifth grade teacher. For another, I taught Math in grades one through five.
For a large part of another, I taught beginning reading to a number of first and second graders. I have spent much time, in many families, in the company of children of all ages, down to a few weeks, and as a frequent visitor to such families, have seen many children grow over a period of many years.
I most emphatically disagree. I know of no more mischievous idea, nor one more strongly deserving opposition, than this notion that, even on matters of common human experience, only the experts shall speak or be heard.
No doubt the opinions of laymen—like me—will generally not be worth much in such fields as sub-atomic physics or molecular biology. But you do not need a Ph. There is a kind of spurious intellectualism to which I am very much opposed. I had expected him to say, indignantly, that of course the average classroom teacher could understand his book. I would have disagreed, but would have respected his wish and intent to be understood.
But this is not so. The tone of his letter makes it clear not that he tried and failed but that he did not try. We must reject and resist the notion that the fewer people can understand an idea, the more important that idea must be.
On the contrary, anyone with an idea has a duty to try to make it understandable to as many people as he can—not excluding the poor corner grocer, above all if it is an idea that may affect his life. The proper business of the intellectual is to make complicated ideas more simple, not simple ideas more complicated; to make the real world more comprehensible, not less so.
Rusk cannot see the reality of Vietnam, because he is blinded by the symbol he has made for it, like the children blinded and incapacitated by what Bruner calls a preemptive metaphor.
A boy looked at fractions and saw knives; Rusk looks at Vietnam and sees dominoes toppling all across Asia. We must bring out symbols as close as we can to reality, and keep them checked against and adjusted to reality, or they will lead us into trouble, disaster, and insanity. But this is just what children in school, compelled too soon and too often to manipulate symbols that are for them largely meaningless, soon become unable to do.
In their anxiety and confusion, they try to turn school, and the world, into a place of rigid and reliable recipes and rules. I did not say or imply that Professor Bruner did not study defensive behavior. I gave his ideas on this subject so much attention precisely because they were such an important part of the book. But he studied defensive behavior in its most extreme forms, in a clinic, when where it most needs to be studied is in the classroom. It is a loss and waste that he has not done so.
In this sense, episodic memory may serve in a large role, e. Semantic memory is connected to the knowledge concerning the world—it is independent of the identity of the person and of personal history Tulving, , p. The units of semantic memory are facts and concepts. The content of semantic memory is something the individual knows whereas the content of episodic memory is something the individual remembers.
The semantic memory is organized in concepts and episodic memory is organized in time. Memory depends on attention; attention and memory cannot operate without each other Chun and Turk-Browne, Attention and its connection to brain activities and memory is widely studied see, practical studies, for example, by Simola et al. Chun and Turk-Browne suggest that, first, memory has a limited capacity, and, hence, attention determines what will be encoded and, second, memory from past experiences guides what should be attended.
Cowan , have proposed a model how the attention and memory are linked to each other. Information that is temporarily in or near conscious awareness is in the focus of attention. Some attention is probably needed to perceive items adequately. Beyond that, one can distinguish between memory with less versus more attention devoted at the time of encoding. The memory retrieval is determined by the conditions of acquisition or encoding and the relation between encoding and retrieval operations.
The more meaningful the analyses of stimuli at hand are, the higher the levels of subsequent retention will be Craik and Lockhart, ; Craik, While this levels-of-processing effect has been mostly studied in the context of verbal information, in their recent study, Baddeley and Hitch showed the similar mechanisms can be found in retention of visual information.
Cognitive models assume that the retention and retrieval of memory can be explained by co-operation between working memory and long-term memory. Working memory refers to the temporary retention of information that was just experienced or just retrieved from long-term memory.
It is short-lived but can be stored for longer periods of time through active maintenance or rehearsal strategies. Even though multiple factors are connected to better results in memory tasks, declarative memories are best established by using active recall combined with mnemonics and spaced repetition 5 Tulving and Schacter, ; Baddeley, The wealth of studies has shown their benefits in designing education and pedagogies to boost long-term retention see recent reviews, e.
In the models of Cowan , and Anderson the working memory is not considered as a separate storage buffer but functions via different levels of activation of the long-term memory storage that is distributed in various areas of the brain.
In this way, the memory retrieval plays an important role in the functioning of the working memory. A basic doctrine of human learning and memory research is that repetition of material improves its retention see Tulving, This tenet was challenged by Karpicke and Roediger , Roediger and Karpicke a , b and earlier by Tulving Their experiments showed that delayed recall is optimized, not with repeated studying sessions, but with repeated testing sessions.
The result was re-interpreted by Lasry et al. They hypothesized that repeated testing might lead to multiple traces to the memory, which facilitate recall, and suggested that the new interpretation would lead to a new framework for explaining the effectiveness of frequent in-class assessments in pedagogies such as Peer Instruction. Alternatively, these could be organized by using feedback via cues to guide the task process Hattie and Timperley, often with the aid of learning technologies e.
Jerome S. Bruner — is one of the key figures of the modern constructivist theories in education along with the Swiss psychologist Jean Piaget — and Russian psychologist Lev Vygotsky — Vygotsky developed the social constructivist learning theories in his Psychology of Art and later works. Bruner was born blind and it may have had an effect on his later career. He himself noted that, during the first two blind years, he had constructed a visual world in his mind Greenfield, Hence, he had a strong intuition that perception is not just controlled by senses but also by mind.
His early study A Study of Thinking Bruner et al. Later, this thinking manifested as cognitive psychology 7 and as constructivist learning theories or constructivism in education in a wide sense see Harasim, , p. The Process of Education Bruner, brought the cognitive revolution to educational discussion. Bruner proposed the idea of a spiral curriculum where a more complex idea can be thought at a simplified level first and at a more complex level later.
The most effective way to develop a coding system is to discover it rather than being told it by the teacher. His Actual Minds, Possible Worlds Bruner, brought the narratives in the center in creating different worlds in the minds. It is one of the most cited academic books in history see Greenfield, The Culture of Education Bruner, is a collection of essays, addresses, and lectures by him about cultural psychology.
This book has made some scholars think that Bruner changed his educational thinking in his later years see discussion in Takaya, Bruner was an ultimate optimist for education. In this matter, he opposed Piaget who thought that there are certain fixed steps for learning dependent on the development of the child. Considering his tremendous influence in the educational practices as well as works and theoretical pondering of scholars in various fields, it is no wonder why Haggbloom et al.
His influence reaches much farther than the academic citations psychological journals or psychological textbooks: his ideas have changed the educational thinking and systems in many countries. According to Bruner , p.
From this point of view, such cognitive—linguistic operations as connecting , differentiating , comparing , and ordering things as well as constructing realities can be thought to be universal ways to save and handle information, stories, and experiences in our brains. The challenge concerning the cognitive—linguistic operations is that, though they are universal, they are language- and syntax specific.
Here, the English words are used as examples. It depends on the situation and the intellectual level of the listeners as to how they understand and interpret the phrase.
We may find many more triggers of this kind. The relevance of these triggers from the contemporary thinking of memory viewpoint is that these triggers make meaning to the stimulus. One of the basic principles of constructivist education is that learning reinforces itself in a spiral way ; new things are learned by building on the previous experiences Bruner, , p.
Bruner proposes that learners construct their own knowledge by organizing and categorizing information using a coding system which should be discovered rather than being told by the teacher. How many apples are left? Another related mnemonic trigger is the structural repetition 11 : the teacher organizes the teaching or study material in such a way that repetition enhances the retention. In structural repetition, the same topic, word, concept or idea is repeated in the same or slightly modified way within the same teaching session or material package.
Naturally, the teacher can use repetition also— teaching the same topic several times. The relevance of these triggers from the contemporary thinking of memory viewpoint is that repeating the material is an effective device for remembering e. This may lead to multiple traces to the memory Lasry et al.
With both these modes, individual experiences are organized and ordered, and given meaning, and problem solving is explained Bruner, , p. This section focuses on the narrative mode and the next section on the logical—scientific mode. With narrative thinking, we can explain human behavior and psychic reality—we are willing to create connections between different facts.
The narrative mode is focused in the affective and functional structures of teaching. In this mode, such elements as intentions, goals, subjective experiences, and the characteristics of individual are in focus Bruner, , p.
Also, they make meaning to the information which enhances the retention e. In narrative thinking, the metaphoric richness and possible contradictions are just as important as the incident to which the metaphor refers Bruner, , pp. A related powerful trigger is the use of the visual image Bruner, , ; Bruner et al. Baddeley , p. Another powerful trigger within the narrative thinking is a narrative or story —and especially a logically plotted story Bruner, , p.
With a plot, that is, by a logical connection of events, it is possible to create a temporal synthesis of actions, goals, and intentions in the story. The plot amalgamates the complexity of the events and creates a coherent story. A good story is open to different interpretations because it leaves things slightly vague—different listeners or readers would fill in the gaps with their own experiences and knowledge Bruner, a , p.
When the story is not true in the factual sense, it can be a fable , parable or allegory. These are related to metaphors: the non-real stories are actually a set of linked metaphors. The hidden metaphoric nature of the parables can also be explained. Though not always understanding the complete layers of the stories, in any event, all listeners, from children to adults, may get something from the stories or parables depending on their intellectual capacity and experiences.
These triggers also make meaning to the stimulus see Craik and Lockhart, ; Baddeley and Hitch, ; Craik, Foremost, using narratives and stories may be strictly connected with the essential procedures of the long-term memory, namely, with our declarative memory, more specifically, with the episodic or narrative memory see Schacter et al.
In the logical—scientific mode, we try to explain the physical reality with the tools of logic, mathematics, and sciences, for example Bruner, , p. The logical—scientific mode is based on the formal and functional structures of thinking; it is based on empirical evidence and logical proofs. Four types of arguments can easily be differentiated: a light argument, conclusion, reference to the something incontrovertible such as hard-fact data, and logical reasoning.
In modern discourse we use deductive , inductive, abductive 14 , and statistical arguments. Another kind of logical mnemonic trigger is logical order in teaching and the material. If the teaching follows a logical order, it is easier to remember.
The relevance of the logical—scientific triggers from the contemporary thinking of memory viewpoint is, foremost, that they make meaning to the information which enhances the retention e. The process of giving arguments and logical order or to make conclusions may also relate to the basic mode of the procedural part of the long-term memory Squire, ; Eysenck and Keane, though its main function is to store something that cannot be put into words Poldrack and Packard, ; Ullman, ; Squire, Namely, it may be possible that the contents of the arguments are stored in the declarative memory while the procedure and logic used in these triggers are stored in the procedural memory.
Bruner and his colleagues Feldman et al. They remind us that, in Aristotelian rhetoric, the cognitive processes of the mind are divided into two types: the emotional and the rational. Here, such rhetoric triggers, which may be related to retention and recalling are focused on.
Ethos refers to the character and credibility of the speaker—how the speaker can make him- or herself believable. Aristotle broadens the original meaning of the word of moral competence to encompass expertise and knowledge. Though Aristotle expressly remarks that ethos can be achieved only by what the speaker says, it seems that, in practice, the appeal of the speaker is also based on the known or assumed expertise of the speaker.
Pathos can be conjured by the passion of the speaker or by the number of emotional items included in the teaching. We achieve pathos also by weighting an important matter, introducing peculiar or new ideas to the audience, or by a hyperbole. The stronger is the pathos the more is the effect.
Here, the focus is in the strict rhetorical triggers within the Brunerian narrative mode in enhancing the retention. This kind of hook is a rhetorical device to attract the attention of the audience and to make them want to listen to the rest of the speech. Aristotle discusses a large variety of feelings such as prejudice, compassion, and anger Aristotle, , Book 1, , jealousy Book 1, , love and hate Book 1, ; , joy and sorrow Book 1, , shame and shamelessness Book 2, , courage Book 1, , excitement and wonder Book 1, , 27 or amusement, relaxation, laughter and ridiculing Book 1, 29 , or terror and pity Book 1, Some of the triggers for these emotions are discussed below.
Other ways to raise the pathos are attaching more weight to what is going to be said , attaching more weight to an important matter, or to use intellectually challenging ideas like paradoxes , peculiar ideas, and ideas beyond the common understanding. We can easily find more these kinds of rhetorical triggers related to pathos. The relevance of the rhetorical ethos and pathos triggers from the contemporary thinking of memory viewpoint is, foremost, that they activate the attention.
It is hypothesized that the new associations between items, and between each item and its context, are set up in the focus of attention Cowan, and that attention determines what will be encoded Chun and Turk-Browne, The more attention is devoted at the time of encoding the more probably we create a memory. For some reason, Bruner was not interested in such elementary mnemonic triggers as rhymes, rhythms, and music in relation with the memory.
However, a cognitive psychologist Baddeley , p. Wallace experimentally showed that text is better recalled when it is heard as a song rather than as speech. A related interesting fact is that aphasic patients, who cannot speak with words because of a severe brain damage, may be able to sing the words, and patients with severe speech problem can increase their word production dramatically by singing see Skeie et al.
These phonological triggers may be cognitive or narrative—we actually do not know exactly why the music and rhythm are effective mnemonic devices.
It seems that the storage of rhymes, rhythms, song texts, and other musical elements is somewhere else than where the language-related elements are see Cohen and Ford, ; Kaan and Swaab, ; Jeffries et al. The individual triggers in Table 1 are in the order found in the course of the article—they are not in order of importance or weight. Kidderminster: British Institute of Learning Disabilities.
Problems viewing video whilst online may be the result of controls on the network you are using to access the SALT materials. Should problems viewing video persist, it is recommended that users download the video using the link provided. The mp4 videos on this site are not compatible with older versions of Windows Media Player.
If you want to watch the videos offline, please download an alternative such as QuickTime or RealPlayer , and set this as your default media player. Alternatively, you may choose to work through the materials in Chrome or Safari. Home Create a study plan Select a module Help Module 1.
Your study level We've preselected "All levels" for you, but you can change your study level at any time by choosing one of the options on this menu. Jerome Bruner born His main focus was on: The importance of culture, social interaction, language and external resources as the media of cognitive development.
The role adults play in children's learning for example, creating the conditions for learning; in supporting thinking and problem-solving Scaffolding: how adults can support children to extend their skills and become independent School curricula for example, the spiral curriculum: based on children's need to reinforce understanding by revisiting concepts previously learned.
Lindon, ; Tilstone and Layton, Bruner and cognitive development. Bruner proposed three modes each with four stages used for representing and organising knowledge: Enactive mode The child understands the world by physically interacting with it months Iconic mode The child begins to develop sensory memory and can learn from sensory presentation, for example, pictures. Conway, Bruner's amplifiers. Students can use this information to slowly build up to more complex ideas and to make connections between concepts.
Promote intuitive thinking, which involves encouraging students to make guesses based on incomplete evidence and then confirm or disprove the guesses systematically.
When students confront a new word in a text, for example, avoid giving them the definition immediately. Instead, ask students to guess its meaning by looking at the words around it.
0コメント